Built for civil cases. Upload the complaint, pick the grounds you want to argue, and get a draft motion to dismiss or a response brief. $25 per motion, no subscriptions. Every citation traces to a real opinion in a 10.7 million opinion corpus.
Count VI fails on two independent grounds: Plaintiff did not plead the sixty-day pre-suit notice that the DTPA requires as a condition of suit, and the complaint does not adequately plead consumer status as to the goods or services that form the basis of her complaint.
Because the pre-suit notice requirement is a statutory prerequisite to a suit for damages under Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 17.50(b)(1), a complaint that omits any allegation of compliance with § 17.505 presents a claim with no basis in law on the face of the pleading under Rule 91a.1.
Independently, the complaint does not adequately plead consumer status. To qualify as a consumer under the DTPA, a plaintiff must (1) seek or acquire goods or services by purchase or lease, and (2) the goods or services purchased or leased must form the basis of the complaint. Lukasik, 21 S.W.3d at 401.
21 S.W.3d 394 (Tex. App. 2000), at 401
We start with the motions that come up most often in civil litigation. Each motion type is built fully (every ground, every state) before we ship it.
Draft a court-ready motion to dismiss. Supports every common ground: failure to state a claim, statute of limitations, lack of standing, jurisdiction, improper venue, arbitration, anti-SLAPP, mootness, ripeness, and more.
Reads the opposing motion you upload, identifies every argument, and writes a response that rebuts each ground with verified authority and the right doctrinal framing for your jurisdiction.
Summary judgment, motions in limine, motions to compel, and other common civil motions are next. We build each motion fully (every strategy, every jurisdiction) before we ship it.
The system handles the legal research, the strategy assembly, and the drafting. You review the output.
Drop the PDF. The system extracts the parties, the causes of action, the alleged facts, and the relevant dates so you don't have to enter them.
The system shows which grounds' conditions appear in the complaint, and how clearly. You select the ones you want to argue. Read the strategy guides for background on each one.
A court-ready draft, fully cited, structured to the conventions of your forum. Click any citation to read the actual opinion before you rely on it.
Reviewing a motion means verifying its authority. In ClearPrecedent that work is built into the page: every case, statute, and rule in the draft is a live link to its source.
Click any citation and the passage it was taken from appears verbatim in a side panel, with a link to the source opinion.
Cases open as the full opinion. Statutes and procedural rules resolve to their text. No reporter volumes, no second research tab.
Read every source without leaving the page. The cite check that used to eat the afternoon happens as you read.
Nothing in the brief points at a case that does not exist. Click a cite in the editor and the passage is right there, verbatim.
Tap any strategy to learn how it works, when it applies, and what arguments judges respond to.
Challenge the court's power to hear the case at all.
Attack the merits of the complaint on the face of the pleading.
Defeat the case on the way it was filed, served, or timed.
Statute-specific shields that beat the case before any merits discovery.
End the case because a prior court already decided it.
One price, per motion. Nothing recurring, nothing locked behind a tier. If you draft one motion this year, you pay for one motion.
The same cost whether the complaint is six pages or sixty. Two motion types currently available:
Free account includes case search, court rules, citation explorer, judge intelligence, and oral arguments. Pay $25 only when you draft a motion.
Every citation in a ClearPrecedent motion traces back to a real source: a real court opinion in our corpus, a real statute, a real rule of procedure. Every quotation is checked character-for-character against the source text, and a motion that fails verification does not ship. The architecture refuses to invent a reporter cite or a case name, and refuses to attach a passage to a proposition the passage does not support.
If a motion ships with a citation that does not exist (a case we cannot point to, a rule that is not on the books, a statute that is not real) or a citation that does not support the proposition cited, your next motion is free or refunded, your choice. No questions, no friction, just email us.
We make this offer because the architecture is built to keep it. Every step in the pipeline, from research to drafting to the verification passes, exists to prevent the hallucinated citations and misapplied authority that get filings sanctioned.
A motion drafted by the system, surfaced exactly as it appears in the app, with the verification layer live.
A motion to dismiss generated by the Motion Builder, surfaced exactly as a user would see it in the app. Click any citation to read the supporting opinion.
Open the demo →Every case, statute, and rule in a draft is a live link. Click a case and the opinion opens beside the motion. Click a statute or a rule and its text appears. Checking a cite takes seconds, not an afternoon.
Click them yourself in the demo →Upload the complaint, pick your grounds, get a draft in about twenty minutes. No subscription, no friction, and the hallucination guarantee is on every motion.